2010-05-03T02:33:15  *** epifanio has joined #opticks
2010-05-03T05:25:03  *** tclarke has joined #opticks
2010-05-03T05:25:03  *** ChanServ sets mode: +o tclarke
2010-05-03T05:41:05  *** goffena has joined #opticks
2010-05-03T05:45:43  *** goffena has quit IRC
2010-05-03T05:52:13  *** goffena has joined #opticks
2010-05-03T06:00:08  *** dsulgrov has joined #opticks
2010-05-03T07:10:27  *** epifanio has quit IRC
2010-05-03T07:17:14  *** kstreith has joined #opticks
2010-05-03T07:17:14  *** ChanServ sets mode: +o kstreith
2010-05-03T09:14:07  *** epifanio has joined #opticks
2010-05-03T09:31:23  *** rforehan has joined #opticks
2010-05-03T09:58:27  <goffena> rforehan:
2010-05-03T09:58:42  <goffena> Opticks 416
2010-05-03T10:00:30  <goffena> When you tested Xerces 3.0.1 and Xqilla 2.2.3, did you try placing a second *.sec file in the Support Files\Security Markings folder?
2010-05-03T10:00:47  <goffena> I had tried that with my build of Opticks 4.3.3 with your patch, and had problems with the second file.
2010-05-03T10:00:53  <rforehan> Sorry, just saw your question.
2010-05-03T10:00:58  <goffena> Crash like behavior if i recall correctly.
2010-05-03T10:01:08  <rforehan> The status meeting is about to start. I'll get back shortly.
2010-05-03T10:01:25  <rforehan> No, I didn't add second *.sec file.
2010-05-03T10:01:31  <goffena> Try it if you have time.
2010-05-03T10:01:45  <goffena> Problem seemed to occur in XmlReader's destructor.  When the Parser is released.
2010-05-03T10:04:10  <goffena> I had noticed the document release was commented out in the XmlReader destructor.
2010-05-03T10:04:15  <goffena> Let me know later if you want more details.
2010-05-03T10:04:15  <goffena> .
2010-05-03T10:04:15  <goffena> .
2010-05-03T10:04:15  <goffena> .
2010-05-03T10:42:35  *** epifanio has quit IRC
2010-05-03T10:56:27  *** epifanio has joined #opticks
2010-05-03T11:01:48  <tclarke> meeting will start in a couple of minutes
2010-05-03T11:02:57  <tclarke> developers are just making their ways back to computers
2010-05-03T11:05:06  <rforehan> goffena: When we do update the Xerces dependency, it will probably be a newer version than 3.01 so we'll need to test adding a second *.sec file at that time.
2010-05-03T11:05:41  <tclarke> ok, let's get started with attendance
2010-05-03T11:05:42  <tclarke> here
2010-05-03T11:05:44  <rforehan> Here
2010-05-03T11:05:44  <kstreith> here
2010-05-03T11:05:57  *** Who8MyLunch has joined #opticks
2010-05-03T11:06:00  <tclarke>    1.  Attendance
2010-05-03T11:06:00  <tclarke>    2. Announce agenda
2010-05-03T11:06:00  <tclarke>    3. Approve April 19, 2010 Meeting Notes. Ask for review and address any problems seen in the notes.
2010-05-03T11:06:00  <tclarke>    4. Open Questions
2010-05-03T11:06:00  <tclarke>    5. Summary and closing
2010-05-03T11:06:10  <goffena> here
2010-05-03T11:06:12  <tclarke> last meeting's notes are here http://opticks.org/confluence/display/opticksChat/April+19%2C+2010+Meeting+Notes
2010-05-03T11:06:18  <tclarke> ok, nothing formal on the agenda so we'll cover open discussion
2010-05-03T11:06:19  <tclarke> first
2010-05-03T11:06:24  <tclarke> looks like we've had some discussion about xerces/xqilla lately
2010-05-03T11:06:30  <tclarke> goffena: you are hoping for a newer version on the next update
2010-05-03T11:06:33  <tclarke> do you know if the 3.1 line will work for you?
2010-05-03T11:06:52  <goffena> still in process of testing Xerces 3.0.1.  will test 3.1.0 if i get the chance.
2010-05-03T11:06:56  <goffena> i really don't need a xerces upgrade
2010-05-03T11:06:58  *** Who8MyLunch has quit IRC
2010-05-03T11:07:01  <tclarke> we're not sure what we'll be using but I suspect it'll be 3.1.1
2010-05-03T11:09:19  <tclarke> what timetime would you like this included? were you hoping for a 4.4.0 release or are you ok with 4.5.0?
2010-05-03T11:09:41  <goffena> i'm not certain my folks need the memory leak issue fixed.
2010-05-03T11:09:49  <goffena> i'll have to think about that 4.4.0 vs 4.5.0
2010-05-03T11:09:52  <goffena> i'll get back to you
2010-05-03T11:09:56  <tclarke> ok
2010-05-03T11:09:58  <tclarke> anything else on xerces?
2010-05-03T11:10:06  <tclarke> if not, I'll re-open discussion
2010-05-03T11:10:10  <tclarke> Google Summer of Code
2010-05-03T11:10:16  <tclarke> we accepted 2 students and you should have seen some information on the developer's mailing list
2010-05-03T11:10:24  <tclarke> they officially start on 24May but will be interfacing with the community a bit before then
2010-05-03T11:10:33  <tclarke> next topic
2010-05-03T11:10:49  <kstreith> python scripting extension
2010-05-03T11:10:55  <kstreith> i have been working on a number of changes that will result in a 1.0.1 release
2010-05-03T11:11:04  <kstreith> at this point I still have to finish Win64 support and adding html documentation
2010-05-03T11:13:24  <kstreith> once those are done I anticipate making the 1.0.1rc1 and then 1.0.1 release of the Python scripting extension
2010-05-03T11:13:32  <kstreith> i'm thinking in the next 4-6 weeks the rc1 will come out
2010-05-03T11:13:43  <kstreith> done on that point
2010-05-03T11:13:47  <kstreith> visual studio 2010 upgrade
2010-05-03T11:13:57  <mconsidi> here
2010-05-03T11:13:58  <kstreith> this has been discussed before, but may end up moving past 4.4.0 and onto 4.5.0, which is scheduled for this fall
2010-05-03T11:14:14  <kstreith> but we still have every desire and intention to upgrade to Visual Studio 2010
2010-05-03T11:14:18  <kstreith> just wanted to pass that along, done
2010-05-03T11:15:23  <rforehan> kip: did you want to mention the scon upgrade?
2010-05-03T11:15:29  <kstreith> yeah, sure
2010-05-03T11:15:31  <tclarke> likely the upgrade will be done over the summer so trunk builds with 2010 should be available before the 4.5.0 release
2010-05-03T11:15:39  <kstreith> I just merged OPTICKS-621 into the trunk/future, this means that 4.4.0 and later
2010-05-03T11:15:48  <kstreith> you will be able to build Opticks on Windows using SCons and the Windows SDK
2010-05-03T11:15:54  <kstreith> you won't need a Visual Studio install per se.
2010-05-03T11:15:58  <kstreith> only if you wish to debug
2010-05-03T11:16:12  <kstreith> we will however be maintaining the Visual Studio build system on Windows, so not everyone will have to convert to SCons on Windows
2010-05-03T11:16:14  <kstreith> you will have a choice
2010-05-03T11:17:45  <kstreith> to go along this, I will be working on methods for plug-in developers to use SCons on Windows as well
2010-05-03T11:17:47  <kstreith> to develop plug-ins
2010-05-03T11:17:54  <kstreith> some of the early efforts for this have already appeared on the developer mailing list
2010-05-03T11:18:01  <kstreith> the intent is to provide more choice on Windows
2010-05-03T11:18:06  <kstreith> some plug-in devs find it easier to use Visual Studio, some find it harder
2010-05-03T11:18:08  <kstreith> done
2010-05-03T11:18:10  <tclarke> any other topics?
2010-05-03T11:18:16  <kstreith> i do
2010-05-03T11:18:22  <kstreith> reminder the open source programming contest is still running
2010-05-03T11:19:40  <kstreith> you have until June 4th to make a submission
2010-05-03T11:19:45  <kstreith> you could win a Nintendo Wii or a PS3
2010-05-03T11:19:48  <kstreith> done
2010-05-03T11:19:53  <tclarke> ok, last chance for topics
2010-05-03T11:20:03  <tclarke> notes will be on the developer's mailing list...next meeting in 2 weeks
2010-05-03T11:20:05  <tclarke> have a good rest of the day
2010-05-03T11:20:08  <tclarke> meeting adjourned
2010-05-03T13:18:38  <goffena> .
2010-05-03T13:18:38  <goffena> .
2010-05-03T13:18:38  <goffena> .
2010-05-03T13:18:42  <goffena> https://issues.ballforge.net/jira/secure/attachment/10601/Dataset.jpg
2010-05-03T13:18:56  <goffena> ModelServices::getDataset(const std::string& name) const = 0;
2010-05-03T13:19:01  <goffena> Does that imply that all Datasets have unique names?
2010-05-03T13:19:20  <goffena> Do Datasets show up in Session Explorer?
2010-05-03T13:19:31  <dsulgrov> yes and yes
2010-05-03T13:20:40  <goffena> If Datasets can show up in Session Explorer, can users rename Datasets?
2010-05-03T13:21:02  <dsulgrov> If there is a need, we could allow that
2010-05-03T13:22:50  <goffena> I think allowing renaming of Datasets would add complications.
2010-05-03T13:23:10  <dsulgrov> it wouldn't be any different than renaming another session item
2010-05-03T13:24:58  <goffena> What signal is emitted when a SessionItem is renamed?  I don't see anything in doxygen for SessionItem.
2010-05-03T13:25:03  <goffena> Or is the signal emitted from SessionExplorer?
2010-05-03T13:25:23  <dsulgrov> since not all session items can be renamed, the signal would be on the specific session item
2010-05-03T13:25:34  <dsulgrov> see Layer::NameChanged
2010-05-03T13:27:24  <goffena> ok.  makes sense.
2010-05-03T13:27:43  <goffena> i think all the other developers or my extension would prefer to never have to handle any sessionitem renaming...
2010-05-03T13:29:08  <goffena> so we wouldn't mind if Dataset SessionItem is not renameable.
2010-05-03T14:06:43  *** tclarke has quit IRC
2010-05-03T14:27:43  *** dsulgrov has quit IRC
2010-05-03T15:09:20  *** epifanio has quit IRC
2010-05-03T15:10:02  *** epifanio has joined #opticks
2010-05-03T15:19:05  *** epifanio has quit IRC
2010-05-03T18:11:31  *** rforehan has left #opticks